Many people believe that animals should be lived freely in their natural habitat. In that reason, they against every restraining action of animals particularly zoos. As far as I can see, I completely disagree with that view because I think that zoos are important and have many advantages for human and for its animals.
The first reason why zoos are important because it can educate human, especially for kids. In this case, if zoos are totally removed and prohibited, people will fully difficult to see diversity of animals in each region or country. Kids will only see animals just on drawing or books. They only can imagine how it shape, colour, figure and anything about animals from around the world. Zoos can be not despicable, if zoos management gives and imitates their zoos like their natural habitat.
Another reason is zoos can be space for researcher because, scientist are easier to control every treating of wild animal in the zoos. Scientist can do their observing with safe. Furthermore the last reason in my mind is zoos can help of wild animal sustainability. Many wild animals are already rare and quite extinct. Which wild animal environment is not really safe for extinct animals. They threatened to be any wild animals.
In conclusion, although many people feel that zoos are reprehensible action, I believe the opposite. I can see the positive site of having zoos. I think world need zoos to sharing knowledge easily, doing research for development of science and to keep animals sustainability.

Putting wildlife in confined spaces is considered a gruesome act in recent times; therefore abolishment of these artificial environments is in demand. Even though some people want to exercise an outright ban on zoos, I firmly hold a belief that abolishing these parks is not a judicious decision. It is fairly easy to comprehend why I acknowledge these sanctuaries should not be banished. The preponderant reason is that it promotes the conservation of animals, especially endangered species. Zoo authorities are being held responsible for providing adequate feed and treatment for the caged animals. For example, if any animal got injured within this artificial environment, the zoo officials are always there to provide medication. Besides, job opportunities are being created by these confined areas. As an overwhelming majority of the fauna are kept caged, workers such as security guards, veterinary doctors are recruited for taking care of them; consequently, it provides assistance to foster the employment rate. In short, wilderness areas are intuitively advantageous for not only animals but also for human beings. Meanwhile, there are some masses who are in disharmony with this recommendation. They believe that keeping the fauna in man-made cells will be infringement of these living creatures. Being in man-made cells means animals are no longer be able to enjoy or roam in their natural habitats which in turn prove damaging to them in some aspects. Why to put innocent animals in artificially created parks for unnecessary reasons when they enjoy more in their nature reserves? Thus, these people strongly criticize to put these vulnerable species in artificial cells as it takes away their freedom. Conclusively, despite the fact zoo snatches the autonomy of innocent living creatures, I wholeheartedly believe that these are only for protecting those species which are on the verge of extinction.