IV- Read the following passage  and mark the letter (A, B, C or D) on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each for  the questions. 
  Aspirin’s origins go back at least as early as 1758 .In that year , Englishman Edward Stone noticed a distinctive bitter flavor in the bark of the willow tree. To Stone , this particular bark seemed to have much in common with “Peruvian Bark ” , which had been used medicinally since the 1640s to bring down fevers and to treat malaria . Stone decided to test the effectiveness of the willow bark. He obtained some , pulverized  it into tiny pieces , and conducted experiments in  its properties . His tests demonstrated that this pulverized willow bark was effective both in reducing high temperatures and in relieving aches and pains .In 1763, Stone presented his findings to the British Royal Society.
  Several , decades later , further studies on the medicinal value of the willow bark were being conducted by two Italian scientists . These chemists , Brugnatelli and Fontana , determined that the active chemical that was responsible for the medicinal  characteristics in the willow bark was the chemical  salicin  , which is the active ingredient of today’s aspirin.
    The name “aspirin”   is the trade name of the drug based on the chemical salicin , properly known as acetylsalicylic  acid . The trade name  “aspirin” was invented for the drug in the 1890s by the Bayer Drug Company in Germany .The first bottles of aspirin actually went on the public just prior to the turn of the century , in 1899. 
 
What is true about Brugnatelli and  Fontana ?
A.They were from Italy   
B.They added a chemical to the willow bark.
C.They conducted studies on the willow bark.
D.They were medical doctors.

Các câu hỏi liên quan

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from 38 to 45.
The oceans are so vast and deep that until fairly recently, it was widely assumed that no matter how trash and chemicals humans dumped into them, the effects would be negligible. Proponents of dumping in the oceans even had a catchphrase: "The solution to pollution is dilution."
Today, we need look no further than the New Jersey-size dead zone that forms each summer in the Mississippi River Delta, or the thousand-mile-wide swath of decomposing plastic in the northern Pacific Ocean to see that this "dilution" policy has helped place a once flourishing ocean ecosystem on the brink of collapse.
There is evidence that the oceans have suffered at the hands of mankind for millennia. But recent studies show that degradation, particularly of shoreline areas, has accelerated dramatically in the past three centuries as industrial discharge and run-off from farms and coastal cities have increased.
Pollution is the introduction of harmful contaminants that are outside the norm for a given ecosystem. Common man-made pollutants reaching the oceans include pesticides, herbicides, chemical fertilizers, detergents, oil, sewage, plastics, and other solids. Many of these pollutants collect at the ocean's depths, where they are consumed by small marine organisms and introduced into the global food chain.
Many ocean pollutants are released into the environment far upstream from coastlines. Nitrogen-rich fertilizers applied by farmers inland, for example, end up in local streams, rivers, and groundwater and are eventually deposited in estuaries, bays, and deltas. These excess nutrients can spawn massive blooms of algae that rob the water of oxygen, leaving areas where little or no marine life can exist.
Solid wastes like bags, foam, and other items dumped into the oceans from land or by ships at sea are frequently consumed, with often fatal effects, by marine mammals, fish, and birds that mistake them for food. Discarded fishing nets drift for many years, ensnaring fish and mammals. In certain regions, ocean currents corral trillions of decomposing plastic items and other trash into gigantic, swirling garbage patches. One in the North Pacific, known as the Pacific Trash Vortex, is estimated to be the size of Texas.
Pollution is not always physical. In large bodies of water, sound waves can carry undiminished for miles. The increased presence of loud or persistent sounds from ships, sonar devices, oil rigs, and even from natural sources like earthquakes can disrupt the migration, communication, and reproduction patterns of many marine animals, particularly aquatic mammals like whales and dolphins.
(Source: Reading Advantage by Casey Malarcher)
Which of the following statements is NOT supported in the passage?
A.The oceans in the past were more contaminated than they are now.
B.Industrial wastes and agriculture run-off are blamed for the degradation of the oceans.
C.It is apparent that the oceans have been polluted for a long time.
D.Many pollutants deposited in the oceans finally become part of the global food chain.

V. Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.
            Because writing has become so important in our culture, we sometimes think of it as more real than speech. A little thought will show why speech is primary and writing secondary to language. Human beings have been writing at least 5,000 years, but they have been talking for much longer, doubtless ever since there have been human beings. When writing developed, it was derived from and represented speech, although imperfectly. Even today, there are spoken languages that have no written form. Furthermore, we all learn to talk well before we learn to write; any child who is not severely handicapped physically or mentally will learn to talk: a normal man cannot be prevented from doing so. On the other hand, it takes a special effort to learn to write; in the past, many intelligent and useful members of society did not acquire the skill, and even today many who speak languages with writing systems never learn to read or write while some who learn the rudiments of those skills do so imperfectly.
To affirm the primacy of speech over writing is not to disparage the later. One advantage writing has over speech is that it is more permanent and makes possible the records that any civilization must have. Thus, if speaking makes us human, writing makes us civilized.
The word “disparage” in the passage mostly means…………..
A.“think that something is more important”
B.“make something seem more important”
C.“think about something carefully”
D.“suggest that something is not important or valuable”